These two studies can be profitably read together and represent two of the best examples of these conflicting interpretations of the Cold War. Gaddis emphasizes Soviet culpability in his largely orthodox treatment, while LaFeber stresses a greater degree of American responsibility in his revisionist account. Gaddis 2005b and LaFeber 2008 are excellent starting points for those seeking relatively brief and straightforward narrative accounts of the US-Soviet conflict. A number of studies are particularly well suited to new international-relations students and scholars seeking context and references for their research on the period. New students and researchers seeking introductory overviews of the Cold War are extremely well served. Many questions remain unresolved, and the boundaries of scholarly inquiry are continually expanding, making it an especially rich field of research for new and experienced researchers alike. Scholars have also been particularly interested in questions of responsibility and blame, especially regarding the origins and end of the Cold War. A great deal of this literature analyzes the evolution of the international system in the decades after World War II, while providing insights into policy formulation and diplomacy. The studies and resources included in this bibliography are designed to guide the new and experienced international-relations researcher through a selection of resources that reveal the myriad complexities, nuances, and contingencies of this seminal and contentious period. ![]() There is a vast and continually expanding literature on the Cold War, offering much of value to international-relations scholars. Indeed, our understanding of the Cold War is constantly subject to reinterpretation, revision, and modification, as new evidence, new methodologies, and new actors emerge from obscurity. ![]() Scholars increasingly, and quite rightly, highlight the many ways in which Asian, African, and Latin American states in particular attempted to transcend the apparent strictures imposed by Soviet-American hostility. Recent studies have done much to complicate the once dominant bipolar understanding of this struggle. While different scholars emphasize different facets of this competition, the Cold War was at once an ideological, political, economic, cultural, military, and strategic contest between the United States and its allies on one hand, and the Soviet Union and its allies on the other. The term “Cold War” refers to the period of Soviet-American antagonism that dominated the international system from approximately 1945 to 1991.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |